BibliographyThis bibliography contains references relevant to technical communication, grouped into major categories. In some groups (e.g. Accessibility) we have listed key sources without further comment (so far). The 'Translation' group is annotated: there is text for each entry explaining what it is about and why you should read it. That is a lot of extra work. We think it is valuable: do you agree? Comment below. The bibliography in categories
|
||||||||||||
|
Last modified May 23, 2012
Comments
For bibiliographies other than books the only RDF based discussion I located was this one from 2006: http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/blogs/iseg/archives/4
My recent review and research at the W3C site shows still no discussion or establishment of a 'de-facto RDF standard for representing bibliographies as yet' as mentioned by this blog author. Still there would be some advantages gained to plan for some form of structure and metadata for bibliography related data.
Yes, I do agree it is important otherwise those current and future technical communicators will not understand how it applies to our industry and/or their work.
And for each of the individual categories I recommend leveraging Book Mashup which can be researched at the following two links:
RDF Book Mashup - http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/bookmashup/
Example book mashup - http://esw.w3.org/topic/SwBooks